{"created":"2023-06-20T13:41:27.085683+00:00","id":1241,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"3747034d-fd24-41bb-bd1e-a0454c2095b0"},"_deposit":{"created_by":11,"id":"1241","owners":[11],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"1241"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:kbu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00001241","sets":[]},"author_link":["3123","3122"],"item_3_biblio_info_12":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2010-03-31","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"34","bibliographicPageStart":"15","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"10","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"人間学研究"},{"bibliographic_title":"Human studies : bulletin of Institute for Cultural and Human Research, Kyoto Bunkyo University","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_3_description_10":{"attribute_name":"抄録(日)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"電子メールによる広告が広く行われることになった結果、迷惑メールが増加する問題が発生した。近年アメリカでは、裁判所が迷惑メールを営利的言論であるコマーシャルスピーチに該当しないと判断し、コモンロー上の動産への不法侵害の不法行為である動産トレスパスを根拠にして損害への救済を認めてきた。しかし、Hamidi判決や一部の学説は電子メールが無形物であるなどの点から、生活妨害の不法行為であるニューサンスを迷惑メールの事例に適用すべきであると主張している。そこで、動産トレスパスとニューサンスの成立要件、迷惑メールへの適用の是非、および最近の判例動向を検討した。その結果、動産へのトレスパスを根拠として救済がなされているが、損害認定にはニューサンスにおける基準が適用され、損害確定の明確化の傾向が認められる。","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_3_description_11":{"attribute_name":"抄録(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"E-mail has become the most important means of commercial speech. Since its inherent convenience and efficiency, e-mail facilitates disturbances from unsolicited bulk messages known as spam. When problems arise in the context of such improper use of e-mail, courts have applied the common law tort of trespass to chattels. Analyzing the applicability of commercial speech guaranteed by First Amendment of Federal Constitution to spam cases，this Note summarizes modern treatment of trespass to chattels, and analyzes the extent to which nuisance law can be applied to the intrusion of unsolicited bulk e-mail. While trespass to chattels continues to be applied by courts，Hamidi decision and some commentators argue the law of nuisance may be an alternative and possibly preferable redress in the context of spam. This judicial trend shows trespass to chattels is still the rationale for the remedy of spam applying the test of damage inherent in nuisance.","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_3_description_15":{"attribute_name":"表示順","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"4","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_3_description_16":{"attribute_name":"アクセション番号","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"KJ00007923579","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_3_description_8":{"attribute_name":"記事種別(日)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"論文","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_3_description_9":{"attribute_name":"記事種別(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"Article","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_3_source_id_1":{"attribute_name":"雑誌書誌ID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AA11469829","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_3_source_id_19":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"18843735","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_3_text_6":{"attribute_name":"著者所属(日)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"京都文教大学人間学部現代社会学科"}]},"item_3_text_7":{"attribute_name":"著者所属(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_language":"en","subitem_text_value":"Kyoto Bunkyo University"}]},"item_access_right":{"attribute_name":"アクセス権","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_access_right":"metadata only access","subitem_access_right_uri":"http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"楪, 博行"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"3122","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"YUZURIHA, Hiroyuki","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"3123","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"コマーシャルスピーチ","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"迷惑メール","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"動産トレスパス","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"ニューサンス","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"commercial speech","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"spam","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"trespass to chattels","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"nuisance","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"アメリカにおけるコマーシャルスピーチと不法行為法-迷惑メールに対応するトレスパスとニューサンス-」","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"アメリカにおけるコマーシャルスピーチと不法行為法-迷惑メールに対応するトレスパスとニューサンス-」"},{"subitem_title":"Commercial Speech and Property Torts; the Applicability of Trespass to Chattels and Nuisance to Spam","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"3","owner":"11","path":["56"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2017-03-23"},"publish_date":"2017-03-23","publish_status":"0","recid":"1241","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["アメリカにおけるコマーシャルスピーチと不法行為法-迷惑メールに対応するトレスパスとニューサンス-」"],"weko_creator_id":"11","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-06-20T14:20:28.570560+00:00"}