WEKO3
アイテム
少年保護手続における手続的保障に関する一考察
https://kbu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/2000372
https://kbu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/2000372bd1e179a-34a5-4ebf-aa26-ed35b5040d29
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
sr27_11_shiomori.pdf (1.2 MB)
|
|
| アイテムタイプ | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2026-03-31 | |||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||
| タイトル | 少年保護手続における手続的保障に関する一考察 | |||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||
| タイトル | Procedural Safeguards in Juvenile Protection Proceedings | |||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||
| 主題 | Procedural safeguards | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||
| 主題 | attendant counsel in juvenile proceedings | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||
| 主題 | juvenile protection proceedings | |||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||
| 著者 |
塩盛 俊明
× 塩盛 俊明
|
|||||||
| 著者（英） | ||||||||
| 姓名 | Toshiaki SHIOMORI | |||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||
| 内容記述 | In juvenile protection proceedings, juveniles occupy a dual position. On the one hand, they are required to explain their own actions and circumstances; on the other hand, they are treated as objects of investigation and assessment by the court. Under such conditions, juveniles often lack the capacity to effectively protect their own interests, particularly in proceedings that may result in adverse dispositions. The role of the attendant counsel is to help ensure that juveniles receive treatment conducive to their sound development, in accordance with the principles of juvenile law. This role includes supplementing or articulating the views of juveniles, who are generally immature both cognitively and linguistically. However, representation by attendant counsel inevitably raises certain difficulties. One issue concerns how the attendant translates a juvenile’s statements—often expressed in immature or ambiguous language—into legally meaningful terms. Another issue arises when the juvenile exercises the right to remain silent: the attendant must then determine how to evaluate and articulate the juvenile’s intentional silence. Although attendant counsel seeks to protect the rights and interests of juveniles through representation, such representation may blur the boundary between the juvenile’s own will and the attendant’s interpretation, thereby risking an undue substitution of the juvenile’s right to self-determination. Nevertheless, representation by attendant counsel is unavoidable in juvenile protection proceedings. Rather than attempting to eliminate representation, it is therefore necessary to address and manage the tensions inherent in it. This article argues that these tensions can be alleviated by emphasizing procedural safeguards that ensure meaningful participation by juveniles in the decision-making process, provide explanations that are understandable to them, and reflect their expressed views, without treating those views as absolute or determinative. |
|||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 総合社会学部研究紀要 en : Bulletin of the Faculty of Social Relations 巻 27, p. 17-28, 発行日 2026-03-31 |
|||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||
| 出版者 | 京都文教大学 | |||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||
| 出版者 | KYOTO BUNKYO UNIVERSITY | |||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 2759-2413 | |||||||
