@article{oai:kbu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000985,
 author = {鈴木, 史子 and SUZUKI, Fumiko},
 journal = {臨床心理学部研究報告, Reports from the Faculty of Clinical Psychology, Kyoto Bunkyo University},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {The aim of the present study is to evaluate the creative attitude in reference to the expression of sand play. In this study, the word of “the creative attitude” doesn’t mean the ability in art. The creative attitude means to have the experience where they express themselves and get their image reflected in sand play, which means the world around them. The results of the previous study revealed that the creative attitude bears some relation to a creative trait which is measured by means of a questionnaire of “openness” and “creative attitude”. The author made two schemata to evaluate the creative attitude in reference to the expression of sand play. The first schema has relation to the points of the questionnaire of “creative attitude,” named “a phase of the construction,” showing the richness of the visual impression. And the second schema has something to do with the points of the questionnaire of “openness,” named “a phase of the narrative,” showing the richness of the imagination. The structure of these schemata consists of six-phases. The author asked 6 participants to evaluate the work of sand play by using these two schemata. The participants evaluated 46 works of sand play. The result of statistic analysis showed a coincidence of evaluation to a large extent and a high correlation coefficient of the ranking. Then the evaluation of some participants has something to do with the trait of the creative attitude. The tendency of how the evaluation related to the trait of the creative attitude accorded with what The author supposed. The author presumed that 6 participants who used these schemata for the first time would understand them and these schemata would be available for them. But the problems of the schema appeared. As the result of the analysis, the author extracts some factors which make the participants confused and some problems of the schema. In “a phase of the construction,” the participants found it difficult to decide in which phase the sandplay was, in some cases. In “a phase of the narrative,” they got confused and found it more difficult to do so. The author modified the previous schema and made two new ones., 10, KJ00005563319, 論文, Article},
 pages = {69--98},
 title = {箱庭の"表現"に反映される創造的態度の評定 ―評定段階図式の検証―},
 volume = {1},
 year = {2009},
 yomi = {スズキフミコ}
}