WEKO3
アイテム
クラスアクションにおける当事者クラスを構成する要件-当事者の多数性と争点の共通性-
https://kbu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/1562
https://kbu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/156207aab2c3-1dc7-43bc-88e7-122e333daee8
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
KJ00007932159.pdf (560.8 kB)
|
|
| Item type | [ELS]紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2017-03-23 | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | クラスアクションにおける当事者クラスを構成する要件-当事者の多数性と争点の共通性- | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | Analysis on the Basic Requirements for Class Certification; Numerosity and Common Questions specified in Federal rules of Civil Procedure Rule 23(a)(1) and (2) | |||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||||
| 雑誌書誌ID | ||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AA12017913 | |||||||||||
| 著者 |
楪, 博行
× 楪, 博行
× YUZURIHA, Hiroyuki
|
|||||||||||
| 著者所属(日) | ||||||||||||
| 京都文教大学人間学部現代社会学科 | ||||||||||||
| 著者所属(英) | ||||||||||||
| en | ||||||||||||
| KYOTO BUNKYO UNIVERSITY Department of Social Design Studies | ||||||||||||
| 記事種別(日) | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | 論文 | |||||||||||
| 記事種別(英) | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | Article | |||||||||||
| 抄録(英) | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 23 specifies that the party seeking class certification for class action must meet at first all requirements under Rule 23(a). The requirements of Rule 23 (a)(1) and (2) reflect the fundamental characteristics of class actions, showing the necessary bond among class members. Rule 23(a)(1) is an impracticability of joinder requirement. Rule 23(a)(2) requires that there be questions of law or fact common to the members of the class. This note focuses on these provisions and analyzes the function of numerosity and common question requirements. Impracticability specified in Rule 23 (a)(1) is not determined by a numerical test alone. Particularly when the purported class is relatively small, courts consider, for example, geographic dispersion among parties, and the judicial economy in avoiding multiplicity of actions. Thus, the practicability of joinder must be evaluated in light of the circumstances of the particular litigation in light of purposes of class action. Rule 23 (a)(2) does not require that all questions of law or fact raised in the litigation be common. The test or standard for meeting the Rule 23(a)(2) prerequisite is that there need be only a single issue common to all members of the class. Therefore, this requirement is easily met in most cases. This note concludes that the requirements of Rule 23(a) (1) and (2) are easily met since they are interrelated as guideposts for determining whether under the particular circumstances maintenance of a class action is efficient. | |||||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
人間学部研究報告 en : Reports from the Faculty of Human Studies, Kyoto Bunkyo University 巻 13, p. 13-23, 発行日 2012-03-31 |
|||||||||||
| 表示順 | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | 3 | |||||||||||
| アクセション番号 | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | KJ00007932159 | |||||||||||
