WEKO3
アイテム
クラスアクション -その成立の背景-
https://kbu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/1578
https://kbu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/1578a91b801c-7dd5-488c-b85b-4671c9f4ba40
| Item type | [ELS]紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2017-03-23 | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | クラスアクション -その成立の背景- | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | Searching for the Origin of the Class Action | |||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||||||||
| アクセス権 | metadata only access | |||||||||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb | |||||||||||
| 雑誌書誌ID | ||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AA12017913 | |||||||||||
| 著者 |
楪, 博行
× 楪, 博行
× YUZURIHA, Hiroyuki
|
|||||||||||
| 著者所属(日) | ||||||||||||
| 京都文教大学人間学部現代社会学科 | ||||||||||||
| 著者所属(英) | ||||||||||||
| en | ||||||||||||
| KYOTO BUNKYO UNIVERSITY Department of Social Design Studies | ||||||||||||
| 記事種別(日) | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | 論文 | |||||||||||
| 記事種別(英) | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | Article | |||||||||||
| 抄録(英) | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | This article traces the history of the class action. It begins with the early Bill of Peace in English Equity Court, moves to the manor cases which are recognized as the first cases of class action in England, and proceeds across the Atlantic to the Equity Rule in the United States. This article analyzes how class action has evolved in the equity cases which were held to be the representative action. Common interest or community interest among people can be found in the development in this procedural device. Common interest or community of interest has justified the use of class action to save time and energy by bringing large number of people into court to avoid the multiplicity of actins until the enactment of original Federal Civil Procedure in 1938. In the one thought that it was a little to influence the constitution study of our country in the discussion concerning an American Supreme Court decision that has had a large influence on the constitution study of our country, there is a discussion concerning "Right of the abortion of the woman". However, it targets in the comparison method, there are a lot of study results, and attention is paid to "Right of the abortion" by many fields. This is because the discussion concerning the artificial abortion is repeated after the decision of Roe v. Wade in 1972. In this text, it takes a general view of typical Supreme court decision on the abortion lasting for 30 years that start from the Roe v. Wade decision. And, it has aimed to confirm the transition of the judgment of the supreme court over the abortion, and to add the examination, and to search for a present attitude to the abortion of the supreme court about Gonzales vs. Carhart decision given to the abortion problem in 2007 of one respondent is concluded what afterwards. | |||||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
人間学部研究報告 en : Reports from the Faculty of Human Studies, Kyoto Bunkyo University 巻 11, p. 53-86, 発行日 2009-03-31 |
|||||||||||
| 表示順 | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | 7 | |||||||||||
| アクセション番号 | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | KJ00005424439 | |||||||||||
