WEKO3
アイテム
大規模不法行為クラスアクションの倒産手続における管轄権
https://kbu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/1608
https://kbu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/16080787cac5-1851-4214-81fb-fcaf262d5e06
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
KJ00004801382.pdf (1.2 MB)
|
|
| Item type | [ELS]紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2017-03-23 | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | 大規模不法行為クラスアクションの倒産手続における管轄権 | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | Jurisdiction of Mass Torts Bankruptcy | |||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||||
| 雑誌書誌ID | ||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AA12017913 | |||||||||||
| 著者 |
楪, 博行
× 楪, 博行
× YUZURIHA, Hiroyuki
|
|||||||||||
| 著者所属(日) | ||||||||||||
| 京都文教大学人間学部・現代社会学科 | ||||||||||||
| 著者所属(英) | ||||||||||||
| en | ||||||||||||
| KYOTO BUNKYO UNIVERSITY Department of Social Design Studies | ||||||||||||
| 記事種別(日) | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | 論文 | |||||||||||
| 記事種別(英) | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | Article | |||||||||||
| 抄録(英) | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | While there have been a growing number of mass tort class actions in the last two decades, the defendant attempts to resolve mass tort class action in the bankruptcy law area. The defendant company filed for Chapter 11 reorganization protection. This trend began in 1982 and after that other companies sought protection from asbestos claims and products liability suits. Once a defendant in mass tort litigation files for bankruptcy, all the pending action is automatically stayed. The automatic stay centralizes the defendant's state and federal mass tort case into a single federal district court. The bankruptcy filing and docketing in federal forum, first of all, raise a question of jurisdiction among federal courts. 28 U.S.C. § 151 refers to a bankruptcy judge and bankruptcy court as a unit of the district court. 28 U.S.C. § 157 (b) (5), personal injury claims and wrongful death actions against bankrupt debtors can be consolidated in the district in which bankruptcy protection is sought or the district in which the claims arose. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1334 (b), the district courts shall have original but not exclusive jurisdiction of all civil proceedings arising under the Bankruptcy Code or arising in or related to cases under the Bankruptcy Code. The term district court appearing in § 157 and § 1334 refers to the district court and bankruptcy court. And bankruptcy cases may be decided by either a bankruptcy judge or a federal district judge. There is therefore constant tension between the exercise and non-exercise of bankruptcy court jurisdiction. | |||||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
人間学部研究報告 en : Reports from the Faculty of Human Studies, Kyoto Bunkyo University 巻 9, p. 1-12, 発行日 2007-03-25 |
|||||||||||
| 表示順 | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | 4 | |||||||||||
| アクセション番号 | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | KJ00004801382 | |||||||||||
