WEKO3
アイテム
「家」をつなぎとめる-近代民間学としての「家系調査」
https://kbu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/1652
https://kbu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/1652e9d69194-e215-4b9b-b67e-55bebe4a3994
| Item type | [ELS]紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2017-03-23 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | 「家」をつなぎとめる-近代民間学としての「家系調査」 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | The Moored "le" ; on the Modem Genealogy as the Civic Studies in Japan | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||||||
| アクセス権 | metadata only access | |||||||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb | |||||||||
| 雑誌書誌ID | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AA11291239 | |||||||||
| 著者 |
小林, 康正
× 小林, 康正
× KOBAYASHI, Yasumasa
|
|||||||||
| 著者所属(日) | ||||||||||
| 京都文教大学人間学部 | ||||||||||
| 著者所属(英) | ||||||||||
| en | ||||||||||
| KYOTO BUNKYO UNIVERSITY Department of Human Studies | ||||||||||
| 記事種別(日) | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | 論文 | |||||||||
| 記事種別(英) | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | Article | |||||||||
| 抄録(日) | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | UNK | |||||||||
| 抄録(英) | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | In recent times, several Japanese people have been interested in genealogy. Numerous books related to the search for one's roots and ancestors have been published, and the history magazines published for the general public often issue special editions on this topic. Societies and study groups on genealogy have also been established. Recently, web sites have been created that enable people with the same surname to come together. Despite the common belief that this "boom" in the search for one's lineage began in the latter half of the 1960s, a similar phenomenon had already occurred during the prewar days, although it did not have much impact. This phenomenon was led by Akira Ota (太田亮 1884-1956). He had majored in Japanese ancient history and had established the Genealogy Association (Keihu-gakkai 系譜学会) in 1921. He was the publisher of the first journal of genealogy and had infused numerous people with an interest in surnames and family lines. Japan has a long history of genealogy and family-line investigation; this is indicated by the edition of the Newly Compiled Record of Surnames (Sinsen-syoziroku 新撰姓氏録) in the early stage of the Heian era. However, modern genealogy differs from the premodern one in terms of social functions and meanings. For example, although premodern genealogy exerted a strong influence on the rights of inheritance and the succession of peerage (On-i 蔭位), modern genealogy does not perform such a function. Since modern genealogy makes a negligible contribution in practical terms, a question arises regarding the reason for the eager interest of the modern Japanese in this subject. Although there appears to be little agreement on how to realize this, it can be said that premodern studies on genealogy merged with modern studies on the subject. The problem involves interpreting the relation between the identity of the modern Japanese and their surnames. The purpose of this paper is to show that modern genealogy is related to the social history of thought and related movements. I would like to trace the process of development of modern genealogy and describe the social situations, social consciousness, and politics that led to its evolution. Of particular importance is the contribution of Ota in the field of genealogy and the trend of using surnames from the Meiji era to the early stages of the Showa era. Modern genealogy can be regarded as a type of Minkan-gaku (民間学), which implies studies by citizens or researchers who do not belong to any academy. The concept of Minkan-gaku was proposed by the historian Masanao Kano (鹿野政直), According to Kano, most of these Minkan-gaku appeared from the 1910s to the 1930s. During and after the Meiji period, the Japanese government established universities and colleges that were referred to as Kan-gaku (官学). These universities educated persons with potential toward the development of the nation and promoted modernization in almost all fields in Japan. As Minkan-gaku were influenced hy Kan-gaku, or rather, opposed hy them, they grew stronger. Although Kan-gaku usually imitated the objective positivism of Western Europe, Minkan-gaku often had a strong sense of purpose and were deeply involved in social and political movements. These aspects of Minkan-gaku may undoubtedly he considered as similar to those of modern genealogy. Modern genealogy started promoting its study without sacrificing its traditional values. It has developed not only with the positivism of historical research hut also with the sense of values for which lineage is esteemed. In order to clarify the complex character of modern genealogy, this paper aims to describe the process of its development as the mutual confluence of the following four practices: (1) The Kan-gaku type of academicism: The objective historical school (2) The Kokugaku-Sintoizm type: National learning school (3) The Keizu-sirahe type: Investigation of pedigree (4) The Deracine type: Hobbies of urbanites, whose roots are untraced It will be possible to argue that modern genealogy developed from the mutual influences of the abovementioned practices and their confluence. The results of the study of the development process of modern genealogy leads to the presumption that the development of modern genealogy is closely related to the political and ideological aspects of Japanese modernization in the following manner: (1) The mutual relationship between the state, "le" (家), and the individual in modernized times. (2) The problem of how to acquire recognition for oneself and others in urbanized times. The former is strongly connected with the studies of surnames (苗字 Myozi, 姓 Sei and 氏 Uzi). Since surnames, which were the names of "le," were used to represent people, they were believed to be valuable. Moreover, the Meiji government emphasized the unique Japanese national policy of Kokutai (国体): characterized by the unbroken reign of the imperial line and the concept of the state as a family, in which-the relationship between the emperor and his subjects is akin to that between a father and his children. The fact that the emperor had no surname and all his subjects had surnames, which were given by the emperor, was regarded as the most important evidence of Japan as a family state. In other words, it is evident that the practice of modern genealogy was strengthened by the concept of the family state. The latter is related to the problem of conducting oneself with regard to the social relations that were newly formed in the modern urban areas in those times. Modern genealogy was required in order to build a new order to deal with strangers in urban areas. This was because most of the new urban areas were separated from the traditional communities, which weakened the traditional relationships in these societies. In conclusion, it should be noted that modern genealogy was construed in the modern urban space, and all nations were stationed in this imaginary space under the assumption that the surname is related to a particular country and indicates national origin. | |||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
人間・文化・心 : 京都文教大学人間学部研究報告 en : Reports from the Faculty of Human Studies, Kyoto Bunkyo University 巻 6, p. 13-48, 発行日 2004-12-28 |
|||||||||
| 表示順 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | 2 | |||||||||
| アクセション番号 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | KJ00009365579 | |||||||||
