WEKO3
アイテム
ドイツにおけるクルド文化紹介行事に見る「文化的自画像」-客体化の言説と差異の問題
https://kbu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/1717
https://kbu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/17178c29aaa2-7f03-429d-944c-c04f9134b17f
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
本文（pdfファイル） (2.0 MB)
|
.png)
|
| Item type | [ELS]紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2019-08-06 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | ドイツにおけるクルド文化紹介行事に見る「文化的自画像」-客体化の言説と差異の問題 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | A Cultural Self - Portrait at a Kurdish Cultural Event in Germany: Discourses of Objectification and the Question of Difference | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| 雑誌書誌ID | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AA11291239 | |||||||||
| 著者 |
石川, 真作
× 石川, 真作
× ISHIKAWA, Shinsaku
|
|||||||||
| 著者所属(日) | ||||||||||
| 京都文教大学人間学部 | ||||||||||
| 著者所属(英) | ||||||||||
| en | ||||||||||
| KYOTO BUNKYO UNIVERSITY Department of Human Studies | ||||||||||
| 記事種別(日) | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | 論文 | |||||||||
| 記事種別(英) | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | Article | |||||||||
| 抄録(日) | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | UNK | |||||||||
| 抄録(英) | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | In this paper, I will describe and analyze the context of cultural objectification, referring to discourses at a Kurdish cultural event in Dusseldorf (Germany), named Ein Kurdishes Dorf in Dusseldorf (A Kurdish village in Dusseldorf). This event was held from August 15 to August 31 1997. It was promoted by a Kurdish immigrant art organization, named Haus der Kurdistan Kunstler e.V. Neuss (House of Kurdish Artists in Neuss). This event included daily programs: theater, folkdances, folksongs, lectures, and some participants from other 'cultures'. Some 'artistic works' are also displayed there. There are, for example, dioramas of 'a destroyed house in a village scorched (by the Turkish army)' or of the ruins at nemurutdag (southeast Turkey), constructed in the Seleucids era. In short, in their discourse, the promoters described and objectified their own culture, as a legitimate heir to properties of Anatolian cultures deriving from Mesopotamian civilization. In contrast, they defined the Turks as plunderers of that culture and implied that there was no such thing as authentic Turkish culture. This discourse should not be criticized from an essentialist (Orientalist) point of view that dichotomizes authenticity/non-authenticity. However the fact is that this discourse is itself decidedly essentialistic. This event can be seen as a manifestation of ethnicity as a constructed phenomenon of interaction. Its discourses can be defined as survival tactics. However, the concept of ethnicity also has essentialist characteristics similar to those of race or nation. If defenders of Kur-dish culture intend to combine these tactics with a divisionist strategy, they may become involved in the predominant modernist discourse. This in turn may cause their political argument on identity to fall into tautology. | |||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
人間・文化・心 : 京都文教大学人間学部研究報告 en : Reports from the Faculty of Human Studies, Kyoto Bunkyo University 巻 1, p. 95-110, 発行日 1998-07-20 |
|||||||||
| 表示順 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | 9 | |||||||||
| アクセション番号 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | KJ00009364320 | |||||||||
