WEKO3
アイテム
自我体験研究の概観と展望
https://kbu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/2579
https://kbu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/257920ea59a0-9d25-4837-aac3-4534f541e17d
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
自我体験研究の概観と展望 (357.4 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2018-03-12 | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | 自我体験研究の概観と展望 | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | Review of Literature on “I-experience” | |||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
| 主題 | I-experience | |||||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
| 主題 | Self as knower | |||||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
| 主題 | narrative | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | journal article | |||||||||||
| 著者 |
千秋, 佳世
× 千秋, 佳世
× Senshu, Kayo
|
|||||||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | The purpose of this study was to review the literature on “I-experience,” which was first investigated by Bühler（1921）. I-experience is an important phenomenon, because it is deeply related to the establishment of “I: Self as knower”（James, 1892）. Nevertheless, little attention had been given to I-experience for a long time, because of historical factors and difficulties studying a subjective experience. In Japan, interestingly, several studies have been conducted on I-experience over the past few decades. They began with a report by the clinical psychologist Nishimura（1978）, who discussed the concept of “I-experience” and was concerned with the crisis aspect of I-experience, that is, it influenced the establishment of the “I”; however, it also caused confusion and was related to depersonalization. After this proposal by Nishimura, empirical studies using questionnaires or semi-structured interviews were initiated. There was some confusion, because each researcher had a different point of view. In this article, I attempted to examine each viewpoint and share my thoughts. For one thing, I proposed that it is important to note the physical sensation involved in I-experience, because many people who had an I-experience remembered vivid sensations and that it was not a conceptual phenomenon. For another, it is necessary to examine what happens in the narrative of an I-experience from the viewpoint of clinical psychology, because it is possible that I-experience involves a traumatic memory. |
|||||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
臨床心理学部研究報告 en : Report from the Faculty of Clinical Psychology 巻 10, p. 51-60, 発行日 2018-03-31 |
|||||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||||
| 出版者 | 京都文教大学 | |||||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 1884-3751 | |||||||||||
