WEKO3
アイテム
産科出血ガイドラインと輸血の準備及び実施についての注意義務の有無
https://kbu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/2593
https://kbu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/2593607321d0-bb82-4b1b-b64b-22aba8e6186a
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
![]() |
|
Item type | 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2018-03-12 | |||||||||||
タイトル | ||||||||||||
タイトル | 産科出血ガイドラインと輸血の準備及び実施についての注意義務の有無 | |||||||||||
タイトル | ||||||||||||
タイトル | Guideline for Obstetrical Critical Hemorrhage and Medical Negligence on Blood Transfusion | |||||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||||||
言語 | ||||||||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
主題 | clinical (practice) guidelines | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
主題 | the standard of medical care | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
主題 | negligence | |||||||||||
資源タイプ | ||||||||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||||
資源タイプ | journal article | |||||||||||
著者 |
大西, 貴之
× 大西, 貴之
× Onishi, Takayuki
|
|||||||||||
抄録 | ||||||||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||||
内容記述 | Since 1990s the number of clinical (practice) guidelines has rapidly been increasing. They are systematically developed statements to assist practitioners and patient decisions about appropriate health care for specific circumstances. They have no legal binding force as they are mainly produced by some associations of medical researchers and practitioners. Nevertheless the growing use of guidelines in medical practice emerges many problems from a legal point of view. In many medical malpractice litigations it is important to determine the standard of medical care. Clinical guidelines plays various roles in its determination. Generally, medical professionals refer them as their shields while patients as their swords. This paper reviews two Judgments on Shizuoka District Court, April 17, 2015 (The court of first instance) and on Tokyo High Court, May 26, 2016 (The court of second instance). One of issues on court proceedings is the evaluation on “Guideline for obstetrical critical hemorrhage” and its application. | |||||||||||
書誌情報 |
総合社会学部研究報告 en : Reports from the Faculty of Social Relations 巻 19, p. 15-22, 発行日 2018-03-31 |
|||||||||||
出版者 | ||||||||||||
出版者 | 京都文教大学 | |||||||||||
ISSN | ||||||||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||||
収録物識別子 | 2188-8981 |