WEKO3
アイテム
アメリカにおける精神的損害の賠償-有害物質不法行為による変容を中心として-
https://kbu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/1567
https://kbu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/156705cdb7f7-9169-42b0-8259-63bb0b272c48
| Item type | [ELS]紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2017-03-23 | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | アメリカにおける精神的損害の賠償-有害物質不法行為による変容を中心として- | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | Emotional Distress Damages: Independent Cause of Action For Fear of Future Harm in Toxic Tort Litigation | |||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||||||||
| アクセス権 | metadata only access | |||||||||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb | |||||||||||
| 雑誌書誌ID | ||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AA12017913 | |||||||||||
| 著者 |
楪, 博行
× 楪, 博行
× YUZURIHA, Hiroyuki
|
|||||||||||
| 著者所属(日) | ||||||||||||
| 京都文教大学人間学部現代社会学科 | ||||||||||||
| 著者所属(英) | ||||||||||||
| en | ||||||||||||
| KYOTO BUNKYO UNIVERSITY Department of Social Design Studies | ||||||||||||
| 記事種別(日) | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | 論文 | |||||||||||
| 記事種別(英) | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | Article | |||||||||||
| 抄録(英) | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | Emotional distress is a mental injury that includes pain such as anxiety or deep grief. Traditionally, recovery for emotional distress for negligent torts has been permitted only when accompanying physical impact or injury. This rule has been argued to be a device to screen out fraudulent claims. On the issue of genuineness of claims for emotional distress, the Restatement of Torts echoes the physical impact rule. Nowadays US society has grown increasingly aware of chemicals exposed to air, water, food, and human health, which is categorized as toxic tort. Toxic tort case presents us a unique characteristic of the tort, latency problem injuries of toxic tort may occur long after plaintiff ceased being exposed by toxin. This note focuses on the damages for emotional distress in toxic torts with this unique characteristic. Some cases decided during 1980’s have showed proof of physical injury no longer be required to recover for negligent infliction of emotional distress. However, in fact, exposed to toxin or subcellular damage has been required. There is a continued need for some of physical impact rule in toxic case. Recent cases also show the physical impact requirement is necessary and fair. Almost all recent cases have reinforced this position that permitting an action for fear of future harm where no physical injury from toxin would likely devastate the court system. Determining seriousness of meritorious fear with physical impact rule being less strict, such as permitting mere expose to toxin is enough to meet the rule, should be the better way to handle the emotional distress damages in toxic tort cases. | |||||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
人間学部研究報告 en : Reports from the Faculty of Human Studies, Kyoto Bunkyo University 巻 12, p. 1-13, 発行日 2011-03-31 |
|||||||||||
| 表示順 | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | 3 | |||||||||||
| アクセション番号 | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | KJ00006961399 | |||||||||||
